British and Afghanistan

Regular price
$0.00
Regular price
Sale price
$0.00
Unit price
per 
Availability
Sold out
Shipping calculated at checkout.

This is a misguided and badly framed question which is a result of reading bad history and exaggerated accounts -THE FIRST GROSS MISPERCEPTION THAT WE ENCOUNTER IS THAT THE BRITISH FAILED IN AFGHANISTAN (1) First Afghanistan was never a state till 1747 and was ruled by various foreign powers (2) The first afghan war which was a STRATEGIC SUCCESS OF BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY despite tactical failures was not a war waged by british state but by a private company with a 80 percent indian army with 75 percent Hindus and about 20 percent and even less British units of British army HIRED by the company and its private European units (3) FIRST AFGHAN WAR WAS A STRATEGIC VICTORY OF THE BRITISH COMPANY AS AFGHAN EMIR BECAME VASSAL OF BRITISH COMPANY AND AGREED TO ORDERS OF THE COMPANY THAT AFGHAN STATE WILL HAVE NO FOREIGN EMBASSY AND FINALLY BY TREATY OF 1857 AFGHAN EMIR ACCEPTED BOUNDARY OF COMPANY WITH INDIA AND ACCEPTED GREEDILY A PERSONAL ALLOWANCE OF 13 LAKH PER YEAR(4) AFGHANISTAN WAS BARREN AND NON PRODUCTIVE AND THE BRITISH COMPANY NEVER OCCUPIED NON PRODUCTIVE POOR AREAS LIKE IT ALLOWED OVER 50 PERCENT OF INDIA TO BE RULED BY LOCAL PRINCES (5) the bottom line is that the British never wanted to occupy Afghanistan (6) yet when British state took India from the company and defeated afghans in two more wars the intention was never to occupy Afghanistan but to keep the Russians and other foreigners out of it in which the British company succeeded (6) The only failure of Britain in occupying a major country was in North America in 1776–83 but again no credit to North American’s but to french naval power - but the North American’s were also English speaking people