COMMENTS -The Impact of Technology from 1700 to 1990-REVIEW –HERB SPENCER-COMMENTS BY A.H AMIN
COMMENTS -The Impact of Technology from 1700 to 1990-REVIEW –HERB SPENCER-COMMENTS BY A.H AMIN
COMMENTS -The Impact of Technology from 1700 to 1990-REVIEW BY HERB SPENCER--COMMENTS BY MAJOR A.H AMIN (RETIRED)
AGHA H AMIN
COMMENTS -The Impact of Technology from 1700 to 1990-REVIEW –HERB SPENCER
- August 2020
- DOI:
- 13140/RG.2.2.19169.74081
- Project:
- How History Moves
- Agha H Amin
I AM ON A GREAT GERMAN PLATFORM RESEARCH GATE (ONLY THE GERMANS COULD HAVE ORGANISED IT-THE MOST SUPERIOR RACE-ALTHOUGH MUCH DAMAGED SINCE 1945 POLITICALLY- AS THEY ARE FEARED BY EVERYONE ! )
Agha H Amin
31.24
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Agha_Amin
WAS ASKED BY RESPECTED COLLEAGUE HERB SPENCER TO COMMENT ON HIS REVIEW BELOW :---
The Impact of Technology from 1700 to 1990
- August 2020
- Project:
- lessons of history
- Herb Spencer
ESSENCE OF THIS SCRIBES CONCLUSIONS:---
1-Technology is only one factor in warfare.
2- Stranger factors have worked like UNEVEN SUPERIOR ADVANTAGE BY THOSE WHO LIQUIDATED BY DESIGN OR BY CHANCE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF AMERICA --WHAT THE USA GOT WAS AN UNEVEN ADVANTAGE BY LIQUIDATING OR IT WAS GODS WILL --- THUS AN ADVANTAGE WITH WHICH NO ONE COULD COMPETE------PLUS REINFORCED BY THE ANGLO SAXON QUALITATIVE SUPERIORITY.
3- SAME COULD NOT BE DONE BY SPANISH WHO HAD BEEN CORRUPTED BY ARAB AND VARIOUS BARBARIAN GENES--BUT NOTABLY ARAB.THEY CAME THERE BUT FAILED TO DO WHAT WHITE ANGLO SAXONS DID----
4- IF MUSLIMS OR LETS SAY ARABS HAD WON AT TOURS AND OCCUPIED FRANCE AND ENGLAND ENGLISH AND SCOTS WOULD HAVE DETERIORATED LIKE SPANISH.
5- FRENCH WERE ALSO HAMPERED BY BAD GENETIC MIXING, BUT RELATIVELY BETTER SO THEY WERE RUNNERS UP IN THE COLONIAL RACE AFTER BRITAIN.
6-IN INDIA FOR EXAMPLE TECHNOLOGICALLY INDIANS AND BRITISH COMPANY WERE ALMOST EVEN AFTER 1770 BUT INDIANS FAILED AS BRITISH WERE ORGANISATIONALLY INFERIOR AND COOULD NOT MATCH THE SUPERIOR ANGLO SAXON ORGANISATION—SOME EXAMPLES ---
(A) INDIANS/AFGHANS/BURMESE/NEPAL/IRAN/CHINA LOST EVERY MAJOR PITCHED BATTLE AND SIEGE EXCEPT :----
- BHURTPORE 1805 AND CHILLIANWALLAH-1849.
- WHERE LOCALS (DEFECTIVE GENES) WON WAS ONLY WHERE THEY WERE OVERWHELMINGLY SUPERIOR IN NUMBERS LIKE
(a) POLLILORE
(b) SOME BATTLES OF FIRST MARATHA WAR—
AGAIN AS OVERWHELMINGLY SUPERIOR
INDIANS AGAINST WEAKEST MICKEY MOUSE
BOMBAY ARMY (3) MONSOONS RETREAT –
AGAIN OVERWHELMING INDIAN SUPERIORITY.
(c) MAIN ISSUE WAS BRITISH COMPANYS ANGLO
SAXON OR CELTIC OFFICER ALSO IMPROVED BY
ENGLISH OCCUPYING IRELAND.THUS EVEN IN
BATTLES WHERE ONLY A SINGLE OFFICER WAS
BRITISH COMPANY INDIANS LOST, EVEN IF THE
SOLDIERS UNDER COMMAND WERE INDIANS.
(d) HYDER ALI WON FIRST MYSORE WAR AS
BRITISH COMPANYS LOGISTICS WERE
OVERWHELMINGLY INFERIOR AND HYDERS
STRATEGY WAS NOT TO FIGHT ANY BATTLE ,
WHICH HE KNEW HE WOULD LOSE, BARRING
ODD CASES LIKE POLLILORE FOR REASONS
DESCRIBED ABOVE.
(e) ANOTHER MAJOR REASON FOR THE COMPANYS
FAILURE IN FIRST MYSORE WAR WAS NO
CAVALRY AND THEY REMEDIED IT STARTING
SECOND MYSORE WAR.WHICH WAS A DRAW
AND THIRD AND FOURTH WARS WHICH WERE
COMPANYS VICTORIES.
(f) INDIANS COULD NOT SYNCRONISE OFFENSIVE
OPERATIONS WITH FIREPOWER AND FAILED
IN OFFENSIVE AS OPERATION OF WAR RIGHT
TILL INDO PAK WARS OF 1947-71 .SAME CASE
WITH ALL NON EUROPEANS INCLUDING TURKS
WHO WERE TOTAL FAILURE AND THE ONLY
THREE PLACES WHERE THEY WON AGAINST
RUSSIA WAS BY BRIBERY (2) KUTALMARA—
UNUSUAL MASSIVE SUPERIORITY (3)
GALLIPOLLI—WHERE TURKS WERE IN
DEFENSE
(g) INDIAN AND PAKISTAN ARMY—TOTAL FAILURE
IN OFFENSE IN ALL THREE WARS EXCEPT IN
CHHAMB WHERE GENERALS MOTHER WAS
NON INDO PAK IRANIAN BRITISH FRENCH.
(h) IRAN IRAQ WAR—Both armies total failure in
offense.
TECHNOLOGY WORKS WHERE THE STATE INVOLVED ARE INTELLECTUALLY , ORGANISATIONAL AND CULTURALLY SUPERIOR AND THE WEST HAS A 500 YEAR ADVANTAGE NOW NARROWING TO 200 YEARS THANKS TO RUSSIANS JAPANESE AND CHINESE.
NUCLEAR POWER HOWEVER HAS ARRESTED THE SUPERIORITY OF THE WEST OVER EAST AND THAT IS WHY ATLANTIC RIM (BRITAIN AND USA-LEADERS AND OTHER VASSALS) HATE THE RUSSIANS , CHINESE,PAKISTANIS AND ARABS.THUS IRAQ WAR, UKRAINE WAR, USA CHINA CONFRONTATION.
LASTLY SMALL EXAMPLES:--
- 98 % INDIAN AND PAKISTAN ARMY WAS RAISED BY BRITISH COMPANYS OFFICERS.
- AS A PAKISTAN ARMY OFFICER SEEING TWO TANK REGT RAISINGS I CAN SAY WITH 200 PERCENT CONFIDENCE THAT PAKISTANI OFFICERS COULD NOT EVEN RAISE A UNIT AS WELL AS BRITISH COMPANYS OFFICERS.
- PAKISTANI STATE ONE OF MOST CORRUPT STATE WHERE CANAL SYSTEM IN PROFIT TILL 1947 WAS FLEECED DRY BY TAX EVASION TILL TODATE AND NOW THE STUPID PEOPLE IN WORLD BANK WANT TO PRIVATISE CANALS.
- JUSTICE--- PAKISTANI AND INDIAN JUDICIARY HIGHLY CORRUPT AND SAME IS CASE WITH CIVIL SERVICE –TWO OF MY UNCLES TOPPED PAKISTANI CSP EXAM ONE SECURING HIGHEST POSITION AND ONE IN FIRST FEW.ONE RESIGNED BECAUSE OF UNFAIR DISCRIMINATION AND JOINED FRENCH BRITISH COMPANY WHERE HE EXCELLED AS CEO---OTHER UNCLE WAS NOT GIVEN THE HIGHEST POSITION IN HIS SERVICE THAT HE DESERVED.
- BRITISH COMPANY VALUED GUTS--- MY REGIMENT 1ST PUNJAB CAVALRY WAS RETAINED ALTHOUGH HALF OF IT GAVE TROUBLE AND SOME JOINED REBELS.THE THOUGHTFUL COMPANYS OFFRS KEPT TWO SQUADRONS AT SAHARANPUR AND MEERUT AND USED ONLY HALF THE UNIT (PATHANS AND SIKHS).
- SHER ALI DEFIED BRITISH IN WW TWO—OVER A MATTER OF HONOUR AND PRINCIPLE---- AND WAS INSTEAD REWARDED BY BRITISH ARMY CHIEF AUK AND GIVEN COMD OF AUKS OWN REGT 1ST
- IN PAKISTAN ARMY I SAW WORST CASES WHERE UPRIGHTNESS WAS PUNISHED, LIKE MY COMMANDING OFFICER AN OUTSTANDING OFFICER WAS RETD FROM SERVICE AS HE HAD REFUSED TO DOWN GRADE MY ANNUAL REPORT IN 1986 AND 1987 AS THE OFFICERS CLOSE TO MILITARY USURPER ZIA WANTED. SO HIS UPRIGHTNESS WAS REWARDED BY RETIREMENT IN 1993.ALTHOUGH HE WAS SO CAPABLE THAT THE ISI EMPLOYED HIM AS COLONEL STAFF FOR SIX YEARS.
- WORST CASE OF INJUSTIC AND DEFECTIVE CHARACTER IS ON RECORD WHEN PAKISTAN ARMY CHIEF GEN MUSHARRAF IN HIS AUTOBIOGRAPHY ACCUSED PREVIOUS ARMY CHIEF KAKAR OF PAROCHIALISM AND TAMPERING SENIORITY.THIS COULD NOT HAPPEN EVEN IN BRITISH COMPANYS TIME WHERE EVEN WHEN A MILITARY OFFICER PROMOTED SOME ONE ARBITRARILY HE WOULD BE CHALLENGED BY COMPANYS DIRECTORS.
- TAX EVASION AND CORRUPTION IN PAKISTAN IS SUCH THAT TAX AS PART OF GDP HAS GONE DOWN FROM 18 TO 8 % IN LAST 20 YEARS.
- EVERY NIGHT I PRAY THAT THE BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY SHOULD RETURN.
- ALTHOUGH THIS IS A RESEARCH PLATFORM AND MY VIEWS MAY SOUND BIASED—MY READING OF HISTORY LEADS ME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT WHEREVER ASIANS OR AFRICANS HAVE INVADED AND OCCUPIED IN EUROPE LIKE RUSSIA , BALKANS , SPAIN , SOUTH FRANCE ,SOUTH ITALY NOTABLY SICILY , PEOPLE ARE DEFECTIVE AND THIS IS PROVEN BY THEIR HISTORY WITH VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS, BAD POLITICAL SYSTEM ETC.
- WHEN YOU BUY A DOG YOU CHECK ITS BLOODLINE BUT NOW IT IS FASHIONABLE TO SAY THAT THERE SHOULD BE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ! THIS IS NONSENSE.
- THE GREATEST DANGER TO EUROPE IS IMMIGRATION (1) BRITAIN IS 40 % DESTROYED , FRANCE 50 % DESTROYED , ITALY 50 % DESTROYED , USA IN NEXT TWO OR THREE DECADES WILL ALSO BE HISPANIC (DEFECTIVE GENES FROM ARAB TIMES SPAIN-700-1400) AND THE GAME WOULD BE OVER.
- BRITAIN HAS BEEN INVADED BY PEOPLE FROM LOWEST MOST RABID CLASSES IN PAKISTAN ETC AND IS ALMOST DESTROYED- LONDONS MUSLIM MAYOR IS ONE EXAMPLE.
- EVEN TECHNICALLY PEOPLE OF THIS PART ARE INFERIOR.IN BANKING THEY CANNOT EFFECTIVELY ORGANISE SIMPLE SOFTWARE ALTHOUGH I HAVE SEEN INDIAN AND PAKISTANIS DISASTOROUSLY MANAGING BANK SOFTWARES.
- THE ONLY RACE THAT IS MASTER IN FINANCE ARE PASHTUNS (PARTICULARLY SULAIMAN KHEL AS THEY HAVE JEWISH GENES)
- EXAMPLES OF NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY ARE NONSENSE AS PAKISTANI BOMB WAS ACQUIRED FROM CHINESE.
- IN RADAR ARABS FOR EXAMPLE CANNOT MANAGE ELINT AND EW AS MANY PAKISTANI RADAR OFFRS SAW.
- THE SLIGHLY SUPERIOR ADVANTAGE THAT INDIANS AND PAKISTANIS GOT WAS BECAUSE OF 100 OR 200 YEARS OF INTELLECTUAL AND ORGANISATIONAL GROOMING BY BRITISH COMPANY OR BRITISH CROWN AFTER 1858 (ALTHOUGH INFERIOR TO COMPANY)
I CAN GO ON BUT MUST STOP AS MY IDEAS MAY BE SEEN AS UNPALATABLE BY MANY SO CALLED LIBERALS !!!
IN THE LAST QUARTER OF MY LIFE I MUST SPEAK THE HARSH TRUTH ABOUT HISTORY EVEN IF IT MEANS ANY WORLDLY LOSS.